Treatcherous Irony

People say one thing and do another entirely different. This is a short exploration into that.  Found this one reposted by a lizard on the 6 New Personality Disorders thread on LGF.  Looks like I’m not alone in trying to expose this crap.

Rodan 1/12/2008 5:51:50 pm PST

Charles,
An man is judge by his enemies.
Be proud that those that hate you are evil.
It says you’re good!

These words were typed by none other than Rodan, King of Sock Puppets from LGF 2.0 back when he supported Mr. Johnson, before Mr. Johnson exposed the nefarious fascist underpinnings that Rodan holds so near and dear. Rodan would later attack Mr. Johnson and be banned from commenting at LGF, creating LGF 2.0.

What a hypocrite Rodan is, claiming Mr. Johnson is good for being hated, and then proceeding to hate him.  It’s somewhat poetically ironic.  I guess Rodan is among the “evil” now.

30 Responses to “Treatcherous Irony”

  1. kristt9 Says:

    hoo-boy. “Hypocrite” seems to be an understatement!
    From Wiki, “cognitive dissonance”:

    Dissonance normally occurs when a person perceives a logical inconsistency among his or her cognitions. This happens when one idea implies the opposite of another. For example, a belief in animal rights could be interpreted as inconsistent with eating meat or wearing fur. Noticing the contradiction would lead to dissonance, which could be experienced as anxiety, guilt, shame, anger, embarrassment, stress, and other negative emotional states. When people’s ideas are consistent with each other, they are in a state of harmony, or consonance. If cognitions are unrelated, they are categorized as irrelevant to each other and do not lead to dissonance.

    Anxiety, guilt, shame, anger, embarrassment, stress and other negative emotional states. This “rodan” must be one confused fella.

  2. Gin-Wulm Says:

    “Rodan 1/12/2008 5:51:50 pm PST

    * 1
    * down
    * up
    * favorite
    * report

    Charles,
    An man is judge by his enemies.
    Be proud that those that hate you are evil.
    It says you’re good!”

    Why that’s the most blatant asskissing I’ve ever seen!

    • African Moondog Says:

      When it comes to Treacherous Irony, nothing can beat LGF01, the way it swung from the anchor of wingnuttery to the extremes of moonbattery in a remarkably short space of time.

      The asininities of “times change and opinions change”, or “we did not change, we evolved”, does not hide the fact that LGF 01 and its minions have no right to bitch about others who may have felt hurt at being banned simply because they could not keep up with this schizophrenic shift, and therefore struck back.

      • A Naughty Mouse Says:

        Moondog – the point is . . .why “strike back”. What purpose is there? In other words, if lgf01 is no longer what somebody is comfortable with, why not just leave, and find another blog (or start one’s own), without all the flounce-off drama and “stalking”. That’s what’s so weird – and insane.

      • Gin-Wulm Says:

        There was no ‘schizophrenic shift’, African Moondog – just a realisation on Charles part that the time had come to clamp down on assholes who were starting to get his site a bad name. What are you defining as ‘extreme moonbattery’ anyway? I don’t see how anything that Charles has said or promoted falls anwhere near that category. Is having a problem with creationism, anti-vaxers, neo nazis(and their two faced sympathizers) what you call ‘extreme moonbattery’?

        Speaking for myself, I didn’t change any of my opinions as a result of events on LGF, I just became a little bit less unpopular once those individuals (who had wrongly assumed on no one’s authority but their own that their thoughts and attitudes were the ‘official’ policy of LGF) started to get flushed.

        You are asking me to cry for those who used to tell me to leave LGF because ‘my type’ weren’t wanted, and who now scream that LGF is evil now thjat they’ve been kicked out. Good luck with that.

      • African Moondog Says:

        A Naughty Mouse said, “why not just leave, and find another blog (or start one’s own)”. A lot of people, who did not “flounce off” but were thrown out, went and did just that, and these blogs grew in popularity. Having done as they were bid, they were then called “haters” and other such nonsense by the LGF acolytes hence the existance of this site.

        Gin-Wulm said “There was no ’schizophrenic shift’, African Moondog – just a realisation on Charles part that the time had come to clamp down on assholes who were starting to get his site a bad name.”

        Charles’s only belatedly realized that the site was filled with “assholes who were starting to get his site a bad name”? Where was Charles in 2002-2006 when these “assholes” made his blog arguably the greatest and the most influential in cyberspace? He knew they were there and indeed he encouraged them. Without them his site would not have been what it was. Yet he discarded them as though they were expendable. He then has the audacity to feign hurt when they ridicule him. Exactly what did he expect and who was he trying to impress anyway?

      • Gin-Wulm Says:

        African Moondog – a small clue for you. Charles is responsible for LGF, no one else. That incidentally, is also why it was necessary for him to clean house. For the idiots to scream that they ‘made’ LGF is funny, because I don’t ever remember going there to read creationist bullshit, rambling pointless bible quotes and calls to kill all muslims – and I don’t recall anyone ever recommending the site on that basis either. So I think there is a huge difference between the reality of what made LGF big – anti idiotarianism – and the fantasies of those who were banned because of their own idiotarian natures.

        Talking of the ‘audacity to feign hurt’ is ridiculous when we are talking about people who deliberately lie, smear and misrepresent, and obsessively stalk you and fantasize about your death and murder, among other things.

  3. Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

    Yeah, Rodan is a certified asshole.

    It doesn’t mean that Charles Johnson is NOT also an even bigger asshole, filled with at least 10x as much bullshit.

    And for all of Rodan’s faults, and they are many and manifest, at least he doesn’t try to destroy the reputations of whose who diss him.

    Charles Johnson needs to evolve. Emerge from the trees and start walking upright. (I’m not asking him to use tools, however…. he has a large number of those posting to his blog and here in his defense.)

    • Gin-Wulm Says:

      “And for all of Rodan’s faults, and they are many and manifest, at least he doesn’t try to destroy the reputations of whose who diss him.”

      What planet are you living on?

      LGF2’s whole ‘mission’ is to do exactly that, with lies and disgusting smears. Charles exposed those suckers for what they are with facts.

      A sample of the class of person you are defending:

      “119. Rodan on 24 June, 2009 at 6:36 pm reply

      re: #117 by Speranza

      I do hate Charles Icarus. He’s a fake phony 2 Face asshole.

      Irish Rose is a street Hooker that offers herself for sale. Her Pimp puts her in her place

      121. Rodan on 24 June, 2009 at 6:40 pm reply

      re: #120 by savage

      Irish Rose is a street Hooker. That swede is her client. She runs tricks.

      123. savage on 24 June, 2009 at 6:42 pm reply

      re: #121 by Rodan

      Does she get a hot poker up her ass? LOL

      128. Rodan on 24 June, 2009 at 6:47 pm reply

      re: #126 by Speranza

      She’s a street trick. Charles probably pimps out her and Sharmuta!

      138. savage on 24 June, 2009 at 6:54 pm reply

      re: #135 by Speranza

      That fat cunt is so much like Rosie O’Donnell it’s scary”

      If you can find a vile screed like that on LGF, show it. But since LGF, unlike LGF2 has standards – you won’t be able to.

    • Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

      Kiss my royal irish ass. I am not defending Rodan, exterminationist and swine.

      All I’m saying is that Charles sucks even worse, since he has a far larger audience, is not a tiresome slacker teenager, and has far less excuse.

    • Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

      Yanno, Gin-bite-the-worm, your bullshit is exactly–come to think of it–the kind of intellectual dishonesty for which Charles is so infamous. If I said that “Hitler was worse than Manson,” you’d say that I was defending Manson. What a tool you are.

      • Gin-Wulm Says:

        If someone were to say, sure the holocaust was bad but that thing those Israelis have been doing to the palestinians is 10x worse…it would be reasonable to say that they were minimising the evils of the holocaust, would it not? I certainly think so. In the same way, by saying that Rodan – in your own words ‘exterminationist’ swine that he is – not to mention the rest – is worse than Charles, whose forum ban policy you happen to have an issue with, effectively minimises Rodan’s sins and makes them seem like they must be relatively trivial. Given that they are in your mind only a tenth of the magnitude of Charles’s, whose sin is to operate a ban policy on his blog that you don’t like, that is indeed the impact of your statement.

  4. Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

    PS, Charles: The word is “Treacherous.” “Treacherous” means that you are implying Rodan is full of fish & chips. I don’t mind misspelling words in teh course of fast typnig (happens to the very best of us) but if you do it in a headline, you get pwned.

  5. Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

    Of course If I make as silly an error as I just did in my last post, *I* get pwned.

    The difference is that I’m willing to admit I made a mistake….

    • Gin-Wulm Says:

      It’s a start. I’d be more impressed if you could own up to the more serious error you are making in defending the indefensible here.

    • Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

      I’d be more impressed with you if you pulled your head out of your ass, Charles.

      The difference between you and Rodan is that Rodan is a dumbfuck teenager and thus cannot be held fully responsible for the fact that he is a dumbfuck. You are supposedly a “man” in your fifties. Start acting like one.

      • Gin-Wulm Says:

        Again, I am not Charles. You need to seek professional help.

        Now, a question for your apparently broken moral compass:

        On the one hand, we have someone who advocates genocide among other extremely stupid and morally defective things. On the other, we have someone who in your opinion bans people from his personal blog for insufficient reason. Which is worse? Take all the time you need.

      • Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

        On the one hand, we have someone who advocates genocide among other extremely stupid and morally defective things. On the other, we have someone who in your opinion bans people from his personal blog for insufficient reason. Which is worse? >>

        THat’s not the question: The question is: Who is the more dangerous?

        1. Teenage asshole to whom nobody pays attention?
        2. Fifty-something loser with an audience of a hundred thousand or so who fucks over people who trust him?

        If you are not Charles, then he has his hand up your ass and is flapping your jaw up and down with his thumb while his fingers hold your skull in place. If you are not he, then why are you such a willing slave of his?

        My moral compass is in perfect working order. I’ve already stated my opinion of Rodan, who is unworthy of further attention.

  6. Sarge Says:

    Hoosier Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooops!

    Awww isn’t that cute? You deleted my post!

    Fascist.

    Hoosier Hoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooops!

  7. Sarge Says:

    …or it could be my bloody internet, and it never actually got through. Must be a Red Chinese DOS attack or a North Korean midget with wire cutters in my intertubes… or something.

    Man the guns!

  8. Artful Dodger Says:

    Why this obsession with another blog Defenseman? I mean Charles Johnson tells people who disagree with him “Go get your own blog” and when they do that, he sets his minnows on them.

    • Richard L. Kent, Esq. Says:

      Why this obsession with another blog Defenseman?>>

      Because Defenseman is Charles, coward and chicken, posting under a sock puppet so that he can continue to do battle with those who think him the loser that he most undeniably is.

  9. Artful Dodger Says:

    “Charles is responsible for LGF, no one else. That incidentally, is also why it was necessary for him to clean house. For the idiots to scream that they ‘made’ LGF is funny, because I don’t ever remember going there to read creationist bullshit, rambling pointless bible quotes and calls to kill all muslims”

    LGF was one of the most anti Islamic jihad websites out there! It’s not only Johnson’s meanness that’s so shocking, it’s his stunning stupidity – there are only a few quality posters that cesspool still has left! Does he really think people come to read the bone-crushingly banal blather of Irish Rose? Or the embarrassingly pathetic fawning of Hoosier Hoops, or the ass kissing of Charles by Sharmuta, or his own snarky editorializing, or the boring photos of fences, the mind numbing jazz sessions, or the blather about biking? That place is like the Animal Farm of the internet; or worse, The Island of Dr. Moreau, and poor old Hoosier Hoops is the confused, shambling ‘Sayer of the Law’.

Comments are closed.